Asteroid 2024 YR4 will not hit Earth, but it has forced planetary defense experts to confront a different kind of worst case: a significant chance that a “city killer” rock could slam into the Moon instead. Rather than an inevitable catastrophe, the current science points to a small but real probability of a lunar strike that could be sharply reduced, or even eliminated, if space agencies decide to act.
That distinction matters. The risk is not certain, and NASA has not declared a Moon impact unavoidable, yet the agency’s own tracking and new research make clear that without some form of intervention, the odds of a collision will not simply vanish on their own.
From Earth threat to lunar target
The story of 2024 YR4 began like many near-Earth object scares, with early calculations that briefly raised the specter of a direct hit on our planet in the 2030s. As more data came in, those numbers shifted, and by Feb 24, 2025, updated modeling showed that the asteroid posed virtually no danger to Earth in that timeframe, with the odds of a direct strike falling to near zero. That shift was later reinforced when NASA reported that, after additional observations, the object no longer posed a significant impact risk to Earth in 2032 and beyond, even as it continues to pass through the vicinity of Earth in 2028.
Relief on the terrestrial front did not end the story. As orbital solutions improved, scientists realized that the same gravitational choreography that spared our planet had redirected concern toward the Moon. A detailed analysis of the asteroid’s path now indicates that 2024 YR4 carries about a 4 percent chance of hitting the Moon on December 22, 2032, a scenario that would leave Earth physically untouched but still grappling with the consequences.
How NASA pinned down the odds
Turning a fuzzy risk into a quantified probability required a global observing campaign and some of the most advanced tools in astronomy. Earlier this year, new infrared measurements from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope narrowed the uncertainty around the asteroid’s size and reflectivity, which in turn sharpened estimates of its mass and how sunlight subtly nudges its orbit. Experts at NASA’s Center for Near-Earth Object Studies used those refinements to update the impact probability, confirming that the risk to Earth was negligible while the chance of a lunar collision remained in the low single digits.
Those calculations sit on top of a broader planetary defense infrastructure that NASA has been building for years. The agency’s dedicated planetary defense program coordinates sky surveys, radar follow-ups, and impact modeling, while the automated Sentry system at the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies continuously scans new observations for potential future impacts. Within that framework, 2024 YR4 is tracked as one of many objects whose orbits are refined over time, with its risk profile updated in the public-facing Sentry database as new measurements arrive.
What a lunar impact would actually mean
Even at only 4 percent, the possibility of a direct hit on the Moon has captured attention because of the scale of the potential blast. Scientists who have modeled the scenario describe 2024 YR4 as a “city killer,” large enough that, if it were on a collision course with our planet, it could cause regional devastation and global effects. In the lunar case, the energy would be dumped into the Moon instead, carving a new crater, lofting plumes of dust, and potentially altering the local environment around future landing sites.
The concern is not limited to the surface. A major impact could eject debris into cislunar space, creating a temporary cloud of rock fragments and dust that might intersect the paths of spacecraft. Reporting on the scenario has noted that any missions in low-Earth orbit could find themselves in the pathway of some of that material, even though the International Space Station is not expected to be directly threatened. For a space economy that is rapidly expanding into lunar orbit and beyond, a fresh debris hazard would be an unwelcome complication.
Why the Moon matters so much now
The timing of this risk intersects uncomfortably with a new era of lunar exploration. NASA’s Artemis program and a growing list of commercial partners are planning a sustained presence on and around the Moon, with landers, orbiters, and eventually a small space station in cislunar space. As one detailed overview of the situation put it, 2024 YR4 is not a threat to Earth, but the Moon has quietly taken its place as the potential target, just as scientists and engineers are investing billions of dollars in lunar infrastructure.
That context helps explain why a 4 percent chance is being treated as more than a statistical curiosity. A detailed briefing from a research institute summarized the situation “at a Glance,” noting that 2024 YR4 shows a 4 percent chance of hitting the Moon on December 22, 2032, with no risk to Earth, and highlighting the role of the James Webb Space Teles in refining those odds. For mission planners designing habitats, communication relays, and fuel depots that are meant to last decades, even a low-probability impact in the early 2030s is a variable they cannot ignore.
How the risk evolved in NASA’s own updates
The path from initial alarm to today’s more nuanced picture has unfolded through a series of official updates. Earlier this year, NASA’s planetary defense blog carried a detailed note explaining how new infrared data from the James Webb Space Telescope had reduced uncertainty in the asteroid’s size and, by extension, its potential impact energy. That Apr 1, 2025 update described how experts at NASA’s Center for Near-Earth Object Studies used those measurements to refine the lunar impact probability, while confirming that Earth itself remained safe.
As additional tracking data accumulated, NASA followed up with another detailed analysis in early June. In that note, the agency explained that, after more observations, it had concluded the object poses no significant impact risk to Earth in 2032 and beyond, even as it continues to pass through the vicinity of Earth in 2028. A broader roundup on the same planetary defense blog later noted that the latest calculations conclude asteroid 2024 YR4 now poses no significant threat to Earth in 2032 and beyond, and that currently, no other object of concern has emerged in that timeframe, a point summarized under the heading Latest Calculations Conclude Asteroid and Now Poses No Significant Threat.
The nuclear debate: bold plan or last resort?
With the risk to Earth off the table and the Moon now in the crosshairs, some researchers have begun to argue that the best option is not to wait and see, but to actively deflect or destroy the asteroid. A paper from several NASA scientists and other researchers, highlighted in late September coverage, explores whether an asteroid with a 4 percent chance of hitting the Moon should be intercepted with a nuclear device before it reaches its target. That analysis, described in detail in a Sep 30, 2025 report, frames the nuclear option as one tool among several, not a foregone conclusion.
Other coverage has gone further, presenting the nuclear concept as a leading candidate. One widely shared story, headlined with the phrase “Nuclear Plan Suggested To Prevent Asteroid Hitting The Moon,” explains why it matters that, while Earth is no longer considered at risk from asteroid 2024 YR4, the Moon now faces around a four percent chance of impact in 2032. That piece, published on Sep 25, 2025, notes that a newly proposed plan by a team of scientists, including NASA researchers, suggests using nuclear explosions to break up or deflect the asteroid in orbit, according to the paper. A companion version of the same report, which includes the phrase Error NaN in its metadata, underscores that even if the risk to Earth is gone, the possibility of a Moon impact remains.
Public messaging and the fine line between alarm and accuracy
As the science has evolved, so has the public narrative, and not always cleanly. Early headlines that focused on a “city killer” headed for Earth have given way to more careful explanations that the asteroid will spare our planet but might hit the Moon instead. A local television report on Jul 25, 2025, for example, emphasized that asteroid 2024 YR4 will spare Earth but might hit the Moon, and noted that any missions in low-Earth orbit could also be in the pathway of the debris, though the International Space Station is expected to remain safe. That kind of framing tries to balance legitimate concern with reassurance, a balance that is not always easy to strike.
NASA’s own communications have leaned heavily on transparency and context, using its planetary defense blog to explain how impact probabilities are calculated and why they change. A broader entry on the planetary defense site, for instance, walks through how new observations can dramatically alter risk assessments, and stresses that currently, no other object poses a comparable threat in the 2032 window. At the same time, independent explainers, including a Sep 21, 2025 video segment that states asteroid 2024 YR4 will not hit Earth but does carry a 4 percent chance of striking the Moon in 2032, have helped translate the technical details into plain language for a broader audience.
Is the impact “unavoidable” without action?
The phrase “unavoidable without action” captures a key tension in how people interpret risk, but it does not reflect NASA’s official language about 2024 YR4. The agency’s published updates describe a 4 percent chance of a lunar impact on December 22, 2032, not a certainty, and they emphasize that the risk to Earth is effectively zero. In other words, the current science says a collision is possible, not guaranteed, and that the probability could still move up or down as more data are collected.
Where the idea of inevitability does enter the conversation is in the logic of planetary defense itself. If nothing is done and the asteroid’s path remains within that narrow corridor that intersects the Moon, then physics will take its course. That is the scenario some researchers have in mind when they argue that the best option to stop it from hitting the Moon is to intervene, potentially with a nuclear device. A concise summary of that argument, published on Sep 22, 2025, notes that an asteroid with a 4 percent chance of hitting the Moon has some researchers proposing that NASA should blow up the asteroid headed for the Moon, framing the nuclear option as a way to prevent a low-probability but high-consequence event.
What happens next
For now, 2024 YR4 remains one entry among many in NASA’s impact monitoring systems, its orbit refined with each new observation. The Sentry system will continue to update its risk assessment as telescopes track the asteroid’s motion, and any significant change in the odds will trigger fresh analysis on the planetary defense blog. A recent overview of the program, which highlighted that the latest calculations conclude asteroid 2024 YR4 now poses no significant threat to Earth in 2032 and beyond, also noted that currently, no other object of similar concern has appeared in the same timeframe, a point summarized under the heading Now Poses No Significant Threat and Earth and Beyond.
In parallel, the policy debate over how aggressively to respond is likely to intensify. Some scientists argue that a nuclear test in deep space, carefully designed and internationally supervised, could both neutralize 2024 YR4 and validate techniques that might one day save cities or even continents. Others warn that jumping to the most extreme option risks setting a precedent that could be misused or misunderstood. What is clear from the reporting is that, while a Moon impact is far from certain, the combination of a nonzero probability, a growing lunar presence, and a finite window to act has turned 2024 YR4 into a real-world case study in how humanity chooses to manage low-likelihood, high-impact threats.
More from MorningOverview