MIT researchers are quietly reimagining what a battery can be, from microscopic power sources to building-scale storage that could reshape how cities use energy. As I look across their latest work, I see a throughline: if you can control batteries at the tiniest scales and manufacture them like electronics, you can eventually stack that innovation into structures the size of warehouses or even skyscrapers.
That vision is still emerging, but the pieces are falling into place in labs, startups, and pilot projects tied to MIT. By combining new chemistries, novel manufacturing methods, and a more resilient supply chain, the institute is edging closer to a future where batteries are not just devices we plug in, but infrastructure we live inside.
From Cell-Sized Power to Building-Sized Storage
When I think about building-sized batteries, I start at the opposite extreme: power sources so small they can sit on a dust mote. MIT engineers recently demonstrated rechargeable batteries that are literally comparable in size to a grain of salt, designed to power cell-sized robots and sensors. These microscopic devices show that electrochemical storage can be patterned and fabricated with the same precision as microchips, which is exactly the kind of control you need if you ever want to embed energy storage into walls, floors, or structural panels at architectural scale. The same techniques that let researchers print and stack tiny electrodes could, in principle, be scaled up into modular units that tile across a building’s footprint, turning the structure itself into a distributed battery network.
What makes these tiny batteries so important is not just their novelty, but the manufacturing mindset behind them. Instead of treating batteries as bulky, hand-assembled objects, the team used microfabrication processes that resemble semiconductor production, carving out electrodes and electrolytes in layers on a wafer. That approach, described in detail in the work on tiny batteries powering cell-sized robots, hints at a future where energy storage is printed, etched, and integrated into other systems rather than bolted on afterward. If you can do that on a chip, you can imagine doing it on a façade panel or a prefabricated wall section, multiplying the effect until an entire building becomes a battery bank.
Why MIT Keeps Betting on Batteries
MIT’s focus on batteries is not a one-off project; it is an ecosystem-level bet that electrochemical storage will underpin everything from transportation to grid resilience. Over the past several years, researchers across departments have been publishing a steady stream of work on new chemistries, manufacturing techniques, and system designs, all aimed at making batteries cheaper, safer, and easier to scale. The institute’s dedicated coverage of battery research breakthroughs shows how these efforts span fundamental materials science, device engineering, and large-scale energy systems, with each layer feeding into the next.
That breadth matters when you start thinking about building-sized batteries, because no single innovation is enough on its own. You need materials that can be produced at industrial volumes, designs that can be integrated into existing infrastructure, and control systems that can manage thousands of interconnected cells without failing. MIT’s broader portfolio of work on advanced battery technologies provides that scaffolding: solid-state concepts that promise safer installations in dense urban environments, grid-focused architectures that can smooth out renewable energy fluctuations, and manufacturing strategies that could make it economical to deploy storage at the scale of apartment blocks or office towers.
24M and the Blueprint for Structural-Scale Batteries
One of the clearest bridges between lab research and building-scale storage comes from a technology platform known as 24M, which was developed by MIT researchers and later spun out into a company. Instead of assembling batteries as stacks of discrete, individually packaged cells, the 24M process uses a semi-solid electrode design that simplifies manufacturing and reduces the amount of inactive material in each unit. That change may sound subtle, but it allows for thicker electrodes, fewer parts, and a more flexible form factor—exactly the kind of characteristics you want if you are trying to integrate batteries into large, structural modules rather than small, rectangular packs.
In reporting on 24M batteries, MIT highlighted how this architecture can lower costs and improve energy density by rethinking how electrodes are made and assembled. For a building-sized battery, those gains translate into fewer modules, simpler installation, and less wasted space inside mechanical rooms or behind walls. The semi-solid approach also lends itself to manufacturing lines that look more like continuous industrial processes than delicate electronics assembly, which is crucial if you want to produce enough capacity to outfit entire neighborhoods with on-site storage. In other words, 24M is not just a better battery cell; it is a template for how structural-scale batteries might be built and deployed.
Securing the Lithium to Build Battery Buildings
Even the most elegant building-integrated battery design will stall if there is not enough raw material to support it, which is why I pay close attention to how MIT-linked startups are trying to expand the lithium supply chain. One such company, Lithios, is working to increase domestic lithium production in the United States, with an eye toward making battery manufacturing less dependent on imports and geopolitically fragile supply routes. For building-sized batteries, that kind of resilience is not a luxury; it is a prerequisite, because large-scale storage projects can require vast quantities of lithium-based materials over multi-decade lifespans.
The effort to expand America’s lithium production is framed around both economic and climate goals: creating new jobs while enabling more renewable energy to be stored and used when needed. If companies like Lithios succeed, they will make it more feasible for utilities, developers, and cities to commit to battery infrastructure that is measured in megawatt-hours rather than kilowatt-hours. That, in turn, opens the door to projects where a single high-rise or industrial complex can act as a buffer for the local grid, soaking up excess solar or wind power during off-peak hours and releasing it when demand spikes.
What Building-Sized Batteries Could Actually Do
When I picture a building that doubles as a battery, I do not imagine a sci-fi skyscraper glowing with neon; I see a fairly ordinary structure whose mechanical spaces and structural elements quietly house large-format cells. Those cells could be arranged in racks in a basement, embedded in prefabricated wall panels, or even integrated into parking structures that already host electric vehicle chargers. The key is that the building would not just consume electricity; it would actively manage and store it, smoothing out the peaks and valleys of demand in coordination with the wider grid. With the right controls, a cluster of such buildings could act like a virtual power plant, providing the same kind of balancing services that today come from gas-fired peaker plants.
There are also safety and reliability questions that become more pressing at this scale, and here I find it useful to look at how other high-energy systems are managed. In rocketry, for example, engineers have long dealt with the challenge of storing and controlling enormous amounts of chemical energy in confined spaces, as documented in detailed histories of rockets and people. Lessons from that world—such as redundant containment, rigorous fault analysis, and conservative operating margins—are directly relevant when you start embedding megawatt-hours of storage into occupied buildings. The more battery systems resemble other critical infrastructure, the more they will need to adopt similar safety cultures and regulatory frameworks.
Urban Life, Mobility, and the Human Scale of Battery Infrastructure
Building-sized batteries are not just an engineering story; they are a mobility and public-space story as well. If a city block can store large amounts of energy locally, it becomes easier to support fleets of electric buses, e-bike charging hubs, and safer street designs that prioritize people over cars. For example, protected bike lanes and pedestrian-first intersections often require new lighting, signaling, and sensor systems, all of which benefit from reliable, distributed power. When I look at guidance on bicyclist and pedestrian safety, I see a clear need for infrastructure that can keep critical crossings illuminated and monitored even during grid disruptions—something a battery-enabled building could help guarantee.
At the same time, the rise of electric micromobility and smart-city devices means more small batteries scattered throughout the urban environment, from scooters to traffic sensors. The tiny, chip-like batteries being developed at MIT could eventually power some of these devices, while larger, building-integrated systems handle the heavy lifting of storing bulk energy. That layered approach—micro-scale storage at the edge, macro-scale storage in structures—could make cities more resilient without overwhelming residents with visible hardware. It also aligns with broader efforts to modernize digital infrastructure, including the kind of low-level tooling and reverse-engineering work showcased in resources like the binary analysis cheat sheet, which underpins the secure software needed to manage complex energy networks.
Policy, Accountability, and the Climate Stakes
None of this happens in a vacuum; policy and accountability will shape how quickly building-sized batteries move from concept to standard practice. Large energy projects sit at the intersection of climate commitments, local permitting, and corporate responsibility, and the history of fossil fuel litigation shows how contentious that space can be. Documents such as the appendix supporting an Exxon legal motion illustrate how deeply questions of disclosure, environmental impact, and long-term risk can cut when energy systems are involved. As batteries become core infrastructure, developers and utilities will face similar scrutiny over lifecycle emissions, sourcing practices, and safety records.
At the same time, the cultural and economic context around energy is shifting in ways that will influence how people perceive large-scale storage. Media and entertainment often shape public expectations about technology, and even seemingly unrelated platforms—like the streaming and download services offered by TVI MP3—depend on data centers and networks that are increasingly powered by renewable energy backed by batteries. As more of the economy runs on electricity rather than combustion, the pressure to decarbonize and stabilize the grid will only grow, making building-integrated storage less of a futuristic add-on and more of a baseline requirement for new construction.
More from MorningOverview